War of Words
By TOMMY FRANKS 10/19/04
On more than one occasion, Senator Kerry has referred to the fight at Tora Bora in Afghanistan during late 2001 as a missed opportunity for America. He claims that our forces had Osama bin Laden cornered and allowed him to escape. How did it happen? According to Mr. Kerry, we "outsourced" the job to Afghan warlords. As commander of the allied forces in the Middle East, I was responsible for the operation at Tora Bora, and I can tell you that the senator's understanding of events doesn't square with reality.
First, take Mr. Kerry's contention that we "had an opportunity to capture or kill Osama bin Laden" and that "we had him surrounded." We don't know to this day whether Mr. bin Laden was at Tora Bora in December 2001. Some intelligence sources said he was; others indicated he was in Pakistan at the time; still others suggested he was in Kashmir. Tora Bora was teeming with Taliban and Qaeda operatives, many of whom were killed or captured, but Mr. bin Laden was never within our grasp.
Second, we did not
"outsource" military action. We did rely heavily
on Afghans because they knew Tora Bora, a mountainous, geographically
difficult region on the border of Afghanistan and Pakistan.
It is where
Afghan mujahedeen holed up for years, keeping alive their resistance to
the Soviet Union. Killing and capturing Taliban and Qaeda
best done by the Afghan fighters who already knew the caves and
Third, the Afghans weren't
left to do the job alone. Special forces
from the United States and several other countries were there,
providing tactical leadership and calling in air strikes.
troops also provided significant help - as many as
100,000 sealed the
border and rounded up hundreds of Qaeda and Taliban fighters.
Contrary to Senator Kerry, President
Bush never "took his eye off
the ball" when it came to Osama bin Laden. The war on terrorism has a
global focus. It cannot be divided into separate and unrelated
one in Afghanistan and another in Iraq. Both are
part of the same
effort to capture and kill terrorists before they are able to strike
America again, potentially with weapons of mass destruction.
cells are operating in some 60 countries, and the United States, in
coordination with dozens of allies, is waging this war on many
As we planned for potential military action in Iraq and conducted counterterrorist operations in several other countries in the region, Afghanistan remained a center of focus. Neither attention nor manpower was diverted from Afghanistan to Iraq. When we started Operation Iraqi Freedom we had about 9,500 troops in Afghanistan, and by the time we finished major combat operations in Iraq last May we had more than 10,000 troops in Afghanistan.
We are committed to winning this war on
all fronts, and we are
making impressive gains. Afghanistan has held the
first free elections
in its history. Iraq is led by a free government made up of its
citizens. By the end of this year, NATO and American forces will
trained 125,000 Iraqis to enforce the law, fight insurgents and secure
the borders. This is in addition to the great humanitarian
already achieved in Iraq.
Many hurdles remain, of
course. But the gravest
danger would result
from the withdrawal of American troops before we finish our work.
we are asking our servicemen and women to do more, in more places, than
we have in decades. They
deserve honest, consistent, no-spin leadership
that respects them, their families and their sacrifices.
against terrorism is the right war at the right time for the right
reasons. And Iraq is one of the places that war must
be fought and won. George W. Bush has his eye on
that ball and Senator John Kerry does
Tommy Franks, a retired general and former commander in chief of the Central Command, is the author of "American Soldier." He is a member of Veterans for Bush.